Category Archives: Collegiate Sport Administration

Chapter 4: Compliance and Title IX

The NCAA regulations have grown over time and now include:

  • Institutional control
  • Student-athletes’ well-being
  • Gender equity
  • Good sporting behavior and ethical conduct
  • Sound academic standards
  • Nondiscrimination
  • Diversity in governance structure
  • Rules compliance
  • Amateurism
  • Competitive equality
  • Recruiting governance
  • Eligibility governance
  • Financial aid governance
  • Governance of playing and practice seasons
  • Governance of postseason competition
  • Governance of economic program operation

The NCAA has a different manual for each of its three divisions. Division I has the most complex governance, as one would expect. However, Title IX applies equally to all three divisions.

The NCAA text describes institutional responsibility as follows:

Each institution shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the Association in the conduct of its intercollegiate athletics programs. It shall monitor its programs to assure compliance and to identify and report to the Association instances in which compliance has not been achieved. In any such instance, the institution shall cooperate fully with the Association and shall take appropriate corrective actions. Members of an institution’s staff, student-athletes, and other individuals and groups representing the institution’s athletics interests shall comply with the applicable Associate rules, and the member institution shall be responsible for such compliance.

NCAA, 2013a, p4

The Compliance Office is an org within a university staffed with one or more Compliance Officers (the book doesn’t specifically say they’re a team but it’s unfathomable that Alabama Football doesn’t have a team).

Recruiting definitions:

  • Contact
    • Face-to-face meeting with student and/or parents
  • Contact Period
    • Time when in-person contact at campus, watching games, and phone/written conversations are permitted
  • Dead Period
    • No direct contact, written/phone still allowed
  • Evaluation
    • Watching student compete
  • Evaluation Period
    • Time when coach may evaluate, write/phone but not have contact
  • Official Visit
    • Any visit paid for by the college
    • College can pay for transportation, meals, and reasonable entertainment expenses
  • Prospective Student-Athlete
    • Starting in 9th grade, or
    • Earlier than 9th grade if you receive financial aid or benefit from the college
  • Quiet Period
    • No contact or evaluation, but may visit and have written/phone correspondence
  • Unofficial Visit
    • Not paid for by the college
  • Verbal Commitment
    • Not binding, unlike signed letter

Violations of NCAA regs:

  • Secondary Violations
    • Unintentional and minor infractions
    • Typically an isolated or inadvertent breach
    • Typically provides no competitive advantage
    • Usually self-reported
    • Repeated secondary can add up to Major Infraction (Violation?) status
  • Major Violations
    • Provides competitive advantage
    • Malicious or otherwise intentional
    • Includes academic fraud, inducements, and failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance

When a major violation is found, an investigation is launched, reported to the enforcement committee, and the allegations are laid out in a meeting. If all parties accept the allegations in the report, a summary disposition may be conducted. There’s a lot more layers to this that the book doesn’t seem very interested in organizing.

Large programs employ outside counsel to prevent major infractions from happening and/or being caught.

The LSDBi is a database of NCAA rules and infractions. Seems really useful!

The CAi is a website that allows compliance administrators to keep detailed records regarding their institution’s current student-athletes and athletic teams. Sounds like what we’re doing also!! That is, at my jorb.

Three prongs of Title IX compliance:

  • Prong 1: Providing athletics participation opportunities that are substantially proportionate to the undergraduate student enrollment
  • Prong 2: Demonstrating a history and continuing practice of expanding opportunities for the underrepresented sex.
  • Prong 3: Full and effective accommodation of the interest and ability of the underrepresented sex.

Prong 1 is the “safe harbor” option but all three are viable.

The definition of sport is apparently also an area of serious inquiry (for example, whether to include something like cheerleading in the calculation)

  • Does the team prepare for and engage in competition?
  • Is it administered by the athletics dept?
  • Is the primary purpose competition or support of other teams?
  • Is it widely viewed as a sport?
  • Is the activity recognized by an athletics conference?

There’s some more Title IX stuff but I’m losing the will to live.

Chapter 3: Leadership and Management

Looks familiar!!!

  • LEADERSHIP
    • Vision
    • Mission
    • Core Values
    • Value Culturization
    • Situational Vision and Decision Making
    • “Transformational Leadership Dimensions”:
      • Vision
      • Inspirational Communication
      • Supportive Leadership
      • Intellectual Stimulation
      • Personal Recognition
  • MANAGEMENT
    • Staffing
      • Use of Search Firms
    • Organizing
    • Evaluating

Also there’s a sideblock on “Showing Initiative Without Taking Liberties”, gulp! That’s one thing I’ve been thinking about a lot having been effectively promoted at my job already. Luckily the sideblock says it’s not easy and there’s no one right answer, which is good because it’s scary!

Ok let’s just get this exam over with ^_^;;

Chapter 2: Governing Bodies

Three levels of control:

  • Institutional
  • Conference
  • National

Conferences can range in size, the largest is the Eastern College Athletic Conference, with D1, D2, and D3 championships (I assume in multiple sports, from the way it’s written).

There are alternatives to the NCAA (who knew), including the NAIA, the NJCAA, and the NCCAA. The newest is the USCAA, formed in 2009.

Internal and External stakeholders in collegiate athletics:

  • Faculty
    • Not commonly very deeply involved as a group
    • FAR is a key role in being liaison between athletics and other faculty
  • Governing boards
  • External stakeholders
    • Fans & alumni
    • The media
    • Entertainment industry
    • Sports apparel industry
    • The government

Conference musical chairs

Page 28: schools changing conferences over the last 5 years (from publication)

NCAA governance structure

  • The executive committee has the power to convene the entire association and controls the other boards of directors/leadership councils
  • Each division has its own governance
    • Division 1 is the subject of the Module 1 discussion
  • Executive leadership is biased towards D1 by design
    • Used to be equitable (what a world that must have been)

81% of NCAA revenue comes from TV contracts…

Probably more things to come, I’m tired.

Chapter 1: A Brief Historical Perspective on Intercollegiate Athletics

New class who dis

(This book only has 12 chapters! It’s one of the smallest of the books I’ve had so far. Also I rented it because I ain’t tryna do this)

The college experience apparently used to be awful, like everything else. The first intercollegiate sporting event was a “regatta” (boat racing event) between a Harvard team and three Yale teams, complete with food and socializing, in 1852. This spread and became a model for other sports to develop collegiate programs.

This whole chapter reads as a back and forth between athletics programs and the faculty of the colleges. Illustrates examples such as boosters “hiring” students and the formation of the ICFR by faculty to regulate student-athletes.

The 1904 football season had 21 deaths (this is where TR intervened and formed the IAA in 1905, renamed the NCAA in 1912 (booooooo (well Avatar Kyoshi did found the Dai Li, so I find this analagous))).

So it looks like the underground economy paying athletes for performance illegally has a long and storied history. It’s a little weird that the book isn’t talking about how this is going on to this very day…

The Sanity Code was created by the NCAA in 1948 as a compromise between southern schools that wanted to award full athletic scholarships and northern schools that were opposed to athletic scholarships.  The Sanity Code outlined that athletic scholarships should be need-based financial aid, not pay-for-play.

Notre Dame and Penn actually negotiated their own television contracts before the NCAA took over and signed contracts, and threatened Penn with being not in good standing. So that was a whole thing. The NCAA’s first billion dollar agreement for men’s D1 postseason basketball (March Madness) was in 1989, and doubled by 1995. When was this book published??

This book actually briefly describes the horrors of the “Indian Problem,” the struggles of dealing with the KKK (the “fighting Irish” origin is actually more badass than I realized), HBCUs, and the growth of women’s sports. Not bad! Pretty dense chapter.

And the chapter ends with the description of a paradigm. And that’s the end of our show! Bonk!